Environmental, Social and Economic Review Note (ESERN)


I. Project Overview

Identification

9882

Project Title

Enhancing legislative, policy, and criminal justice frameworks for combating poaching and illegal wildlife trade in Africa

Managing Division

Ecosystem Division

Type/Location

Regional

Region

Africa

List Countries

Gabon, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia

Project Description

Strengthening policies, laws, and criminal justice capacities to address poaching and illegal wildlife trade (IWT) in five target countries in Africa

Estimated duration of project:

2018 - 2020 (18 months)

Estimated cost of the project :

2,105,000 USD

Funding Source:GEF

II. Environmental Social and Economic Screening Determination

Summary of the Safeguard Risks Triggered

Safeguard Standard Triggered by the Project

Impact of Risk (1-5)

Probability of Risk (1-5)

Significance of Risk (L, M, H)*

SS 1: Biodiversity, natural habitat and Sustainable Management of Living Resources

1

1

L

SS 2: Resource Efficiency, Pollution Prevention and Management of Chemicals and Wastes

1

1

L

SS 3: Safety of Dams

1

1

L

SS 4: Involuntary resettlement

1

1

L

SS 5: Indigenous peoples

1

1

L

SS 6: Labor and working conditions

1

1

L

SS 7: Cultural Heritage

1

1

L

SS 8: Gender equity

1

1

L

SS 9: Economic Sustainability

1

1

L

Additional Safeguard questions for projects seeking GCF-funding (Section IV)

NA

NA

NA

*Refer to the UNEP ESES Framework (Chapter 2) and the UNEP’s ESES Guidelines


ESE Screening Decision

  • Low risk
  • Moderate risk
  • High risk
  • Additional information required


Development of ESE Review Note and Screening Decision


 ESERN Prepared by:Name: Johan RobinsonDate: 1 August 2017
Conforms to ESES FrameworkName: Yunae Yi
Date: 3 August 2017
Accepted by Project Manager: Name: Date:


 Recommended further action from the Safeguard Advisor

This is likely to be a low risk project as the work is mainly in the normative area.  The project is “expected to” create positive environmental and social impacts in the target countries in terms of biodiversity and habitat preservation, wildlife-human conflict avoidance, economic development, increased tourism revenues, etc. But, safeguard screening is on “unintended” or “indirect” harm that it may bring to the environment or the people.

 

The project plans to guide wildlife-related national policy, legislation and regulations.  While its intention is to improve regulations of protected areas and land tenure, potential implication of such policy and regulations can be critical for marginalized and vulnerable people who may be affected by proposed changes.  Please ensure that the project identified and pay attention to the vulnerable and marginalized groups (e.g., different tribes, gender, ethnic group, the type of livelihood activities they carry out and so on) through balanced representation of stakeholders and regular communication. Identifying the root causes of illegal poaching and helping governments to address the issues around them should be considered in the policy formulation.