Versiunile în comparație

Cheie

  • Această linie a fost adăugată.
  • Acest rând a fost eliminat.
  • Formatarea a fost modificată.

Environmental, Social and Economic Review Note (ESERN)



Extras
hiddentrue

Countries: Regional (Burkina Faso, Benin, Cote d'Ivoire, Cameroon,  Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Chad)

Amount: US$ 1,084,875,445

1,084,875,445


I. Project Overview


Identification

5535

Project Title

Improving IWRM, knowledge-based management and governance of the Niger Basin and the Iullemeden-Taoudeni/Tanezrouft Aquifer System (NB-ITTAS)

Managing Division

Ecosystem Division

Type/Location

Regional (Burkina Faso, Benin, Cote d'Ivoire, Cameroon, Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Chad)

Region

Africa

List Countries

Regional (Burkina Faso, Benin, Cote d'Ivoire, Cameroon,  Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Chad)

Project Description

Project Objective: Improving knowledge‐based management, governance and resources conservation of the Niger Basin and the Iullemeden‐Taoudeni/Tanezrouft Aquifer System (ITTAS) to support IWRM for the benefit of communities and the resilience of ecosystems

Estimated duration of project:

60 Months

Estimated cost of the project :

GEF Grant:              13,425,000

Co-finance:              1,071,450,445

Funding Source:GEF


II. Environmental Social and Economic Screening Determination

Summary of the Safeguard Risks Triggered

Safeguard Standard Triggered by the Project

Impact of Risk (1-5)

Probability of Risk (1-5)

Significance of Risk (L, M, H)*

SS 1: Biodiversity, natural habitat and Sustainable Management of Living Resources

1

1

L

SS 2: Resource Efficiency, Pollution Prevention and Management of Chemicals and Wastes

1

1

L

SS 3: Safety of Dams

1

1

L

SS 4: Involuntary resettlement

1

1

L

SS 5: Indigenous peoples

1

1

L

SS 6: Labor and working conditions

1

1

L

SS 7: Cultural Heritage

1

1

L

SS 8: Gender equity

1

1

L

SS 9: Economic Sustainability

1

1

L

Additional Safeguard questions for projects seeking GCF-funding (Section IV)

NA

NA

NA

*Refer to the UNEP ESES Framework (Chapter 2) and the UNEP’s ESES Guidelines


ESE Screening Decision

  •  Low risk
  •  Moderate risk
  •  High risk
  •  Additional information required


Development of ESE Review Note and Screening Decision


 ESERN Prepared by:Name:Kelly WestDate:


Conforms to ESES FrameworkName: Date:


Accepted by Project Manager: Name: Date:


 Recommended further action from the Safeguard Advisor